dc.contributor.author | Lu, Elaine Yi | |
dc.contributor.author | Mohr, Zachary | |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-25T18:08:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-25T18:08:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lu, Elaine Yi, Zachary Mohr, and Alfred Tat-Kei Ho. "Taking Stock: Assessing and Improving Performance Budgeting Theory and Practice." Public Performance & Management Review 38.3 (2015): 426-58. DOI: | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/18511 | |
dc.description | This is the author's final draft. Copyright 2015 Taylor & Francis. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Since the passing of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, the
past 20 years represent one of the most remarkable eras for performance budgeting initiatives in
the United States. As a result, many studies about this tool have also been conducted and
published. Based on a systematic review of articles on performance budgeting-related research in
major journals in the ten years between 2002 and 2011, this study assesses how performance
budgeting research has evolved over time, reviews its accomplishments, and suggests a few
directions for future studies, such as the need to control for different intervening factors to
establish causality, the need for more coherent theoretical frameworks to guide empirical work
and structure the relationship between causal factors, and the need for methodological diversity.
We also present a few long-standing questions of performance budgeting that future studies may
revisit carefully. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.subject | performance budget | en_US |
dc.subject | performance based budget | en_US |
dc.subject | performance management | en_US |
dc.subject | PBB | en_US |
dc.subject | GPRA | en_US |
dc.subject | PART | en_US |
dc.title | Taking Stock: Assessing and Improving Performance Budgeting Theory and Practice | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei | |
kusw.kudepartment | Public Affairs & Administration | en_US |
kusw.oanotes | Per SHERPA/RoMEO 9/25/15: PAuthor's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
Author's Post-print: green tick author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing)
Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF
General Conditions: Some individual journals may have policies prohibiting pre-print archiving
On author's personal website or departmental website immediately
On institutional repository or subject-based repository after a 18 months embargo
Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
On a non-profit server
Published source must be acknowledged
Must link to publisher version
Set statements to accompany deposits (see policy)
The publisher will deposit in on behalf of authors to a designated institutional repository including PubMed Central, where a deposit agreement exists with the repository | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |