Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLu, Elaine Yi
dc.contributor.authorMohr, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorHo, Alfred Tat-Kei
dc.identifier.citationLu, Elaine Yi, Zachary Mohr, and Alfred Tat-Kei Ho. "Taking Stock: Assessing and Improving Performance Budgeting Theory and Practice." Public Performance & Management Review 38.3 (2015): 426-58. DOI:en_US
dc.descriptionThis is the author's final draft. Copyright 2015 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.description.abstractSince the passing of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, the past 20 years represent one of the most remarkable eras for performance budgeting initiatives in the United States. As a result, many studies about this tool have also been conducted and published. Based on a systematic review of articles on performance budgeting-related research in major journals in the ten years between 2002 and 2011, this study assesses how performance budgeting research has evolved over time, reviews its accomplishments, and suggests a few directions for future studies, such as the need to control for different intervening factors to establish causality, the need for more coherent theoretical frameworks to guide empirical work and structure the relationship between causal factors, and the need for methodological diversity. We also present a few long-standing questions of performance budgeting that future studies may revisit carefully.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectperformance budgeten_US
dc.subjectperformance based budgeten_US
dc.subjectperformance managementen_US
dc.titleTaking Stock: Assessing and Improving Performance Budgeting Theory and Practiceen_US
kusw.kuauthorHo, Alfred Tat-Kei
kusw.kudepartmentPublic Affairs & Administrationen_US
kusw.oanotesPer SHERPA/RoMEO 9/25/15: PAuthor's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) Author's Post-print: green tick author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF General Conditions:

Some individual journals may have policies prohibiting pre-print archiving On author's personal website or departmental website immediately On institutional repository or subject-based repository after a 18 months embargo Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used On a non-profit server Published source must be acknowledged Must link to publisher version Set statements to accompany deposits (see policy) The publisher will deposit in on behalf of authors to a designated institutional repository including PubMed Central, where a deposit agreement exists with the repository
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record