Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhyte, Kyle Powys
dc.contributor.authorBrewer, Joseph P., II
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Jay T.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-10T22:18:17Z
dc.date.available2015-04-10T22:18:17Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-02
dc.identifier.citationWhyte, Kyle Powys, Joseph P. Brewer II, Jay T. Johnson. 2015. Weaving Indigenous science, protocols and sustainability science. Sustainability Science 37 (5): 691-700.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/17380
dc.descriptionThis is the author's accepted manuscript, made available with the permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe proceedings of the National Science Foundation supported WIS2DOM workshop state that sustainability scientists must respect the “protocols” of practitioners of Indigenous sciences if the practitioners of the two knowledge systems are to learn from each other. Indigenous persons at the workshop described protocols as referring to attitudes about how to approach the world that are inseparable from how people approach scientific inquiry; they used the terms caretaking and stewardship to characterize protocols in their Indigenous communities and nations. Yet sustainability scientists may be rather mystified by the idea of protocols as a necessary dimension of scientific inquiry. Moreover, the terms stewardship and caretaking are seldom used in sustainability science. In this case report, the authors seek to elaborate on some possible meanings of protocols for sustainability scientists who may be unaccustomed to talking about stewardship and caretaking in relation to scientific inquiry. To do so, the authors describe cases of Indigenous protocols in action in relation to scientific inquiry in two Indigenous-led sustainability initiatives in the Great Lakes/Midwest North American region. We claim that each case expresses concepts of stewardship and caretaking to describe protocols in which humans approach the world with the attitude of respectful partners in genealogical relationships of interconnected humans, non-human beings, entities and collectives who have reciprocal responsibilities to one another. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of Indigenous protocols for future dialog between practitioners of sustainability and Indigenous sciences.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundationen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Managementen_US
dc.subjectClimate Change Management and Policyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Economicsen_US
dc.subjectLandscape Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectSustainable Developmenten_US
dc.subjectPublic Healthen_US
dc.subjectTraditional ecological knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous scienceen_US
dc.subjectReciprocityen_US
dc.subjectGuardianshipen_US
dc.subjectCaretakingen_US
dc.subjectStewardshipen_US
dc.subjectSustainability scienceen_US
dc.subjectMeskawkien_US
dc.subjectAnishinaabeen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.titleWeaving Indigenous science, protocols and sustainability scienceen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorBrewer, Joseph P.
kusw.kuauthorJohnson, Jay T.
kusw.kudepartmentEnvironmental Studiesen_US
kusw.kudepartmentGeographyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11625-015-0296-6
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record