dc.contributor.author | Marquis, Don | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-27T20:18:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-27T20:18:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999-08-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Marquis, Don. "How to Resolve an Ethical Dilemma Concerning Randomized Clinical Trials." The New England Journal of Medicine Volume 341 Number 9 691-3. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199908263410912 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/16896 | |
dc.description.abstract | An apparent ethical dilemma arises when physicians consider enrolling their patients in randomized clinical trials. Suppose that a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments is in progress, and a physician has an opinion about which treatment is better. The physician has a duty to promote the patient's best medical interests and therefore seems to be obliged to advise the patient to receive the treatment that the physician prefers. This duty creates a barrier to the enrollment of patients in randomized clinical trials.1-10 Two strategies are often used to resolve the dilemma in favor of enrolling patients in clinical trials. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Massachusetts Medical Society | en_US |
dc.title | How to Resolve an Ethical Dilemma Concerning Randomized Clinical Trials | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Marquis, Donald | |
kusw.kudepartment | Department of Philosphy | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1056/NEJM199908263410912 | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |