Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarquis, Don
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-27T20:18:22Z
dc.date.available2015-02-27T20:18:22Z
dc.date.issued1999-08-26
dc.identifier.citationMarquis, Don. "How to Resolve an Ethical Dilemma Concerning Randomized Clinical Trials." The New England Journal of Medicine Volume 341 Number 9 691-3. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199908263410912en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/16896
dc.description.abstractAn apparent ethical dilemma arises when physicians consider enrolling their patients in randomized clinical trials. Suppose that a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments is in progress, and a physician has an opinion about which treatment is better. The physician has a duty to promote the patient's best medical interests and therefore seems to be obliged to advise the patient to receive the treatment that the physician prefers. This duty creates a barrier to the enrollment of patients in randomized clinical trials.1-10 Two strategies are often used to resolve the dilemma in favor of enrolling patients in clinical trials.en_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Societyen_US
dc.titleHow to Resolve an Ethical Dilemma Concerning Randomized Clinical Trialsen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorMarquis, Donald
kusw.kudepartmentDepartment of Philosphyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJM199908263410912
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record