dc.contributor.author | Ware, Stephen J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-18T23:06:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-01-18T23:06:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Stephen J. Ware, Judicial Elections, Judicial Impartiality and Legitimate Judicial Lawmaking: Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar, 68 VAND. L. REV. EN BANC 59 (2015). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/16310 | |
dc.description.abstract | At the level of constitutional law, Williams-Yulee is a First Amendment case about judicial campaign fundraising. The First Amendment issues raised by judicial campaigns and money in politics are vital, and they are not the only issues implicated by Williams-Yulee. Williams-Yulee also implicates broader questions about how judicial election campaigns should be funded and ultimately whether to have judicial elections at all. I bring to Williams-Yulee a longstanding interest in a wide range of legal and policy issues surrounding judicial selection, including issues surrounding the extent and implications of correlations between judicial campaign contributions and judges’ rulings. Williams-Yulee seems an opportune time to reconsider my and others’ longstanding concerns about judicial elections. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc | |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/content/articles/2015/01/Judicial-Elections-Judicial-Impartiality-and-Legitimate-Judicial-Lawmaking-Williams-Yulee-v.-The-Florida-Bar.pdf | |
dc.relation.hasversion | http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2550460 | |
dc.subject | Judicial elections, judicial selection, campaign finance | |
dc.title | Judicial Elections, Judicial Impartiality and Legitimate Judicial Lawmaking: Williams-Yulee v. the Florida Bar | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Ware, Stephen | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |