Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, Stephen J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-18T23:06:28Z
dc.date.available2015-01-18T23:06:28Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationStephen J. Ware, Judicial Elections, Judicial Impartiality and Legitimate Judicial Lawmaking: Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar, 68 VAND. L. REV. EN BANC 59 (2015).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/16310
dc.description.abstractAt the level of constitutional law, Williams-Yulee is a First Amendment case about judicial campaign fundraising. The First Amendment issues raised by judicial campaigns and money in politics are vital, and they are not the only issues implicated by Williams-Yulee. Williams-Yulee also implicates broader questions about how judicial election campaigns should be funded and ultimately whether to have judicial elections at all. I bring to Williams-Yulee a longstanding interest in a wide range of legal and policy issues surrounding judicial selection, including issues surrounding the extent and implications of correlations between judicial campaign contributions and judges’ rulings. Williams-Yulee seems an opportune time to reconsider my and others’ longstanding concerns about judicial elections.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherVanderbilt Law Review En Banc
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/content/articles/2015/01/Judicial-Elections-Judicial-Impartiality-and-Legitimate-Judicial-Lawmaking-Williams-Yulee-v.-The-Florida-Bar.pdf
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2550460
dc.subjectJudicial elections, judicial selection, campaign finance
dc.titleJudicial Elections, Judicial Impartiality and Legitimate Judicial Lawmaking: Williams-Yulee v. the Florida Bar
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorWare, Stephen
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record