Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWright, Bryan L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T13:35:35Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T13:35:35Z
dc.date.issued1987-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/13737
dc.descriptionThis is the published version.
dc.description.abstractThe United States Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of whether police officers' failure to inform a suspect of his attorney's efforts to reach him would deprive the suspect of information essential to his ability to knowingly waive his fifth amendment rights under Miranda. The Court also considered the effect of the officers' misinforming the suspect's attorney about their plans to interrogate the suspect. Finally, the Court decided whether the officers' actions violated the suspect's sixth amendment right to counsel and fourteenth amendment guarantee of due process. In Moran v. Burbine, the Court held that the officers' conduct did not violate the suspect's fifth, sixth, or fourteenth amendment rights.
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas School of Law, Criminal Justice Clinic
dc.titleInterrogations and Police Deceptions – Moran v. Burbine
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorWright, Bryan L.
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record