ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
A deontológiai prioritás: Gondolatrokonság Ny. F. Fjodorov és a »korai szlavofilizmus« képviselői között
dc.contributor.author | Medzibrodszky, Alexandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-03T20:44:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-03T20:44:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-02-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/SCN.1808.12921 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2385-8753 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/12921 | |
dc.description.abstract | N. F. Fedorov (1829–1903) je eden najbolj izvirnih ruskih mislecev vseh časov, kljub temu da je bil v sovjetskem obdobju praktično nepoznan. Zgodnji slovanofilski misleci, kot so na primer Aleksei Homyakov, Ivan Kireevski in Konstantin Aksakov, so pogosto omenjeni kot možni vplivi na Fedorova, čeprav njihova intelektualna podobnost še ni bila podrobno analizirana. Članek izpostavlja podobne tematske ideje Fedorova in zgodnjih slovanofilov, hkrati pa preučuje posebno, idealistično rabo terminologije, ki je značilna za vse navedene mislece in ki ne poudarja ontologije – kar obstaja ali je obstajalo, temveč deontologijo – kar bi moralo obstajati. N. F. Fedorov (1829–1903) is considered to be one of the most original Russian thinkers of all time, although he was virtually unknown during the Soviet period. “Early Slavophile” thinkers, i.e., Aleksei Khomyakov, Ivan Kireevski and Konstantin Aksakov are frequently mentioned as possible influences on Fedorov, but their intellectual similitude has not been thoroughly analyzed. This paper identifies similar thematic ideas between Fedorov and the early Slavophiles and also examines the particular “idealistic” use of terminology that characterizes all of these thinkers and which puts emphasis not on ontology, i.e., on what exists or existed, but on the sphere of deontology, i.e., on what should exist. | |
dc.rights | All articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Fedorov, N.F. | |
dc.subject | slovanofili | |
dc.subject | A. Khomyakov | |
dc.subject | Kireevsky, I. | |
dc.subject | Aksakov, K. | |
dc.subject | ruska filozofija | |
dc.subject | ruska intelektualna zgodovina | |
dc.subject | Slavophiles | |
dc.subject | Russian philosophy | |
dc.subject | Russian intellectual history | |
dc.title | A deontológiai prioritás: Gondolatrokonság Ny. F. Fjodorov és a »korai szlavofilizmus« képviselői között | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17161/SCN.1808.12921 | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |