Using Bayesian networks for bankruptcy prediction: Some methodological issues
View/ Open
Issue Date
2007-07-16Author
Sun, Lili
Shenoy, Prakash P.
Publisher
Elsevier
Format
380445 bytes
Type
Article
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study provides operational guidance for building naıve Bayes Bayesian network (BN) models for bankruptcy prediction. First, we suggest a heuristic method that guides the selection of bankruptcy predictors. Based on the correlations and partial correlations among variables, the method aims at eliminating redundant and less relevant variables. A naıve Bayes model is developed using the proposed heuristic method and is found to perform well based on a 10-fold validation analysis. The developed naıve Bayes model consists of eight first-order variables, six of which are continuous. We also provide guidance on building a cascaded model by selecting second-order variables to compensate for missing values of first order
variables. Second, we analyze whether the number of states into which the six continuous variables are discretized has an impact on the model’s performance. Our results show that the model’s performance is the best when the number of states for discretization is either two or three. Starting from four states, the performance starts to deteriorate, probably due to over-fitting. Finally, we experiment whether modeling continuous variables with continuous distributions instead of discretizing
them can improve the model’s performance. Our finding suggests that this is not true. One possible reason is that continuous distributions tested by the study do not represent well the underlying distributions of empirical data. Finally, the results of this study could also be applicable to business decision-making contexts other than bankruptcy prediction.
ISSN
0377-2217Collections
Citation
Lili, S. and P. P. Shenoy, "Using Bayesian networks for bankruptcy prediction: Some methodological issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 180, No. 2, 2007, pp. 738--753.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.