Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBricke, John J.
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Nicholas Keith
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T19:53:40Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T19:53:40Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-31
dc.date.submitted2013
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:12700
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/12319
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I defend the thesis that qualitative mental states known as qualia (e.g., tastes, feelings, pains) are identical to physical properties. In Chapter 1, I argue that qualia have a functional role in the world, and that is to facilitate non-automatic mental processes. In Chapter 2, I demonstrate how non-reductive accounts of the mind fail. In Chapter 3, I demonstrate how my reductive account fares better than similar accounts with respect to common and contemporary objections. In Chapter 4, I address arguments against any view like mine which seeks to understand qualia in a physicalistic framework.
dc.format.extent147 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectBrain
dc.subjectConsciousness
dc.subjectMind
dc.subjectQualia
dc.titleWhy Sensations Must be Neurological Properties: A Defense of the Identity Theory
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberSymons, John
dc.contributor.cmtememberTuozzo, Thomas
dc.contributor.cmtememberEggleston, Ben
dc.contributor.cmtememberVitevitch, Michael
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePhilosophy
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid8086109
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record