Quieting Cognitive Bias with Standards for Witness Communications
Issue Date
2011Author
Wilson, Melanie D.
Publisher
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Type
Article
Version
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1850819
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Last year, as part of a project to revise the ABA Criminal Justice Standards for Prosecution and Defense Functions, the ABA Criminal Justice Section initiated round-table discussions with prosecutors, criminal defense lawyers, and academics throughout the United States. The Standards under review provide aspirational guidance for all criminal law practitioners. This Article stems from the Criminal Justice Section's undertaking. It considers the wording, scope, and propriety of several of the proposed changes that address lawyer-witness communications. It begins with a discussion of the effects of cognitive bias on these communications and explains why carefully tailored standards may lessen the detrimental impact of those biases. Then, the Article examines in detail three challenging, yet common aspects of communications that the Standards seek to influence: (1) communicating with witnesses about their future communications with opposing counsel, (2) communicating warnings to witnesses, and (3) communicating with experts. Ultimately, the Article argues for clarity in the Standards to reduce the impact of unwanted cognitive bias to which we are all vulnerable.
Description
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
Collections
Citation
Melanie D. Wilson, Quieting Cognitive Bias with Standards for Witness Communications, 62 HASTINGS L.J. 1227 (2011).
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.