dc.contributor.author | Sward, Ellen E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-08-02T20:33:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-02T20:33:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1989 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ellen E. Sward, Values, Ideology, and the Evolution of the Adversary System, 64 IND. L.J. 301 (1989). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/11569 | |
dc.description | Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record. | |
dc.description.abstract | The hallmark of American adjudication is the adversary system. The virtues of the adversary system are so deeply ingrained in the American legal psyche that most lawyers do not question it. The majority of the world, however, uses some version of the inquisitorial system that evolved primarily in continental Europe. Further, some chinks in the adversarial armor have recently begun to appear. This article analyzes them. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Indiana University Maurer School of Law | |
dc.relation.hasversion | http://ssrn.com/abstract=2238681 | |
dc.title | Values, Ideology, and the Evolution of the Adversary System | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Sward, Ellen E. | |
kusw.kudepartment | School of Law | |
kusw.oastatus | waivelicense | |
kusw.oapolicy | The license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |