ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcAllister, Stephen R.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-16T18:57:41Z
dc.date.available2013-07-16T18:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationStephen R. McAllister, 'Insider' Deaning, 34 U. TOL. L. REV. 121 (2002).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/11498
dc.descriptionFull-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
dc.description.abstractThis essay discusses the positives and the negatives of being an “insider” law school dean, one who arrives as dean with considerable knowledge of and history with the law school, either as an alumnus/a, a faculty member, or in some cases, both. The essay identifies and discusses four factors that, ironically, may be both strengths and weaknesses for an “insider” dean: knowledge of the faculty, respect and credibility with the faculty, familiarity with the institutional environment, and the “I am not going anywhere” syndrome. The essay concludes that insider deans face some challenges that deans arriving from the outside do not, but the opposite is also true. Ultimately, insider deaning has significant rewards, just like outsider deaning.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Toledo College of Law
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2044082
dc.title'Insider' Deaning
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorMcAllister, Stephen R.
kusw.kudepartmentSchool of Law
kusw.oastatuswaivelicense
kusw.oapolicyThe license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record