Wheaton v Greenleaf: A (Story) Tale of Three Reporters
Issue Date
1999Author
McAllister, Stephen R.
Publisher
The Supreme Court Historical Society
Type
Article
Version
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2044080
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article recounts some of the history of the early reporters of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, including the efforts of Justice Joseph Story to cultivate the regular and widely available reporting of Supreme Court decisions, his close friendship with Henry Wheaton — the Court’s third reporter, and Story’s relationship with Simon Greenleaf, well-known Harvard law professor and reporter for the Supreme Court of Maine who narrowly missed out on becoming the Court’s fourth reporter in a situation that both Story and Greenleaf regretted. The article publishes a letter from Greenleaf to Story expressing interest in the position of Supreme Court reporter and seeking Story’s support, but the letter arrived too late, after Story already had promised his support to Richard Peters, Jr. The article also briefly recounts the Supreme Court case of Wheaton v. Peters, in which Wheaton and Peters battled over whether the Court’s reporters held copyright interests in the Supreme Court decisions they reported. The article notes that, but for the belated delivery of Greenleaf’s letter to Story, the case might instead have been styled Wheaton v. Greenleaf, or perhaps there would have been no case at all.
Description
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
Collections
Citation
Stephen R. McAllister, Wheaton v Greenleaf: A (Story) Tale of Three Reporters, 2 J. SUPREME CT. HIST. 53 (1999).
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.