Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGlicksman, Robert L.
dc.contributor.authorMcAllister, Stephen R.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-16T18:19:53Z
dc.date.available2013-07-16T18:19:53Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationRobert L. Glicksman & Stephen R. McAllister, State Liability for Environmental Violations: The U.S. Supreme Court’s 'New' Federalism, 29 ENVTL. L. REP. 10655 (1999).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/11494
dc.descriptionFull-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
dc.description.abstractThis article examines whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alden v. Maine, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, and Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, restrict the ability of Congress to regulate state compliance with federal environmental statutes. The article discusses the various enforcement mechanisms identified in Alden v. Maine and that remain valid, notwithstanding any Eleventh Amendment or constitutional immunity the States may retain. The article concludes that the Supreme Court’s federalism decisions will likely have limited practical impact upon Congress’ authority to enact and ensure the enforcement of environmental statutes.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEnvironmental Law Institute (ELI)
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2044079
dc.titleState Liability for Environmental Violations: The U.S. Supreme Court’s 'New' Federalism
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorMcAllister, Stephen R.
kusw.kudepartmentSchool of Law
kusw.oastatuswaivelicense
kusw.oapolicyThe license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record