Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHalaby, Andrew F.
dc.contributor.authorMcAllister, Stephen R.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-16T18:18:25Z
dc.date.available2013-07-16T18:18:25Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationAndrew F. Halaby & Stephen R. McAllister, An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Reliance on Racial 'Stigma' as a Constitutional Concept in Affirmative Action Cases, 2 MICH. J. RACE & L. 235 (1997).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/11493
dc.descriptionFull-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses one of the asserted costs of affirmative action: stigmatization. The article offers structure to the debate over the definition and constitutional significance of the concept of “stigmatization” in the affirmative action context. In addition, the article sets forth a model for analyzing “stigma” as a constitutional concern, identifies particular strains of stigma on which the Supreme Court has relied, and analyzes the Supreme Court’s use of the concept in affirmative action cases.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan Law School
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2044052
dc.titleAn Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Reliance on Racial 'Stigma' as a Constitutional Concept in Affirmative Action Cases
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorMcAllister, Stephen R.
kusw.kudepartmentSchool of Law
kusw.oastatuswaivelicense
kusw.oapolicyThe license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record