dc.contributor.author | Halaby, Andrew F. | |
dc.contributor.author | McAllister, Stephen R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-16T18:18:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-16T18:18:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Andrew F. Halaby & Stephen R. McAllister, An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Reliance on Racial 'Stigma' as a Constitutional Concept in Affirmative Action Cases, 2 MICH. J. RACE & L. 235 (1997). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/11493 | |
dc.description | Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record. | |
dc.description.abstract | This article addresses one of the asserted costs of affirmative action: stigmatization. The article offers structure to the debate over the definition and constitutional significance of the concept of “stigmatization” in the affirmative action context. In addition, the article sets forth a model for analyzing “stigma” as a constitutional concern, identifies particular strains of stigma on which the Supreme Court has relied, and analyzes the Supreme Court’s use of the concept in affirmative action cases. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | University of Michigan Law School | |
dc.relation.hasversion | http://ssrn.com/abstract=2044052 | |
dc.title | An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Reliance on Racial 'Stigma' as a Constitutional Concept in Affirmative Action Cases | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | McAllister, Stephen R. | |
kusw.kudepartment | School of Law | |
kusw.oastatus | waivelicense | |
kusw.oapolicy | The license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |