Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarper Ho, Virginia E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-08T15:26:17Z
dc.date.available2013-02-08T15:26:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationHarper Ho, Virginia E., Corporate Governance as Risk Regulation in China: A Comparative View of Risk Oversight, Risk Management, and Accountability (August 28, 2012). University of Kansas School of Law Working Paper, August 28, 2012.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/10791
dc.descriptionFull-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
dc.description.abstractRisk management and oversight have long been recognized as core corporate governance issues and have gained renewed attention in the wake of the financial crisis. Following global trends, recent corporate governance reforms in China also focus on risk oversight and risk management. This article is the first to examine the intersections between corporate governance and risk regulation in China from a comparative perspective. It surveys corporate governance tools that have been adopted by Chinese regulators and firms to motivate effective risk oversight and risk management across the corporate enterprise, focusing on China’s regulation of internal controls and risk management systems. These internal mechanisms are particularly important given the widely recognized limits of external monitoring and enforcement mechanisms within China. This article observes that recent guidelines on enterprise risk management (ERM) and internal controls reflect international corporate governance standards, and that China adopts a broad perspective on risk oversight that extends to both financial and non-financial risks. China’s adoption of international models offers a new opportunity to reexamine long-standing debates on the potential for global corporate governance convergence. This article argues that China has adopted a regulatory approach to internal risk oversight and management that is consistent with its historical law reform trajectory, the reality of China’s state-dominated equity markets, and the continued influence of the state on firm management. Its conclusions support the literature on the path dependency of corporate governance systems and prior comparative studies of corporate governance in China that find convergence of form but divergence of function.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherLexxion
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2137715
dc.subjectCorporate governance
dc.subjectRisk management
dc.subjectErm
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectEurope
dc.subjectInternal controls
dc.subjectStakeholders
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibility
dc.titleCorporate Governance as Risk Regulation in China: A Comparative View of Risk Oversight, Risk Management, and Accountability
dc.typeWorking Paper
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record