Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeYoung, Robert
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Emma Y.
dc.contributor.authorYan, Meng
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T19:18:28Z
dc.date.available2012-09-13T19:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2010-01
dc.identifier.citationDeYoung, Robert. Peng, Emma Y. Yan, Meng. (2010) "Executive Compensation and Business Policy Choices at U.S. Commercial Banks." Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/10085
dc.description.abstractThis study examines whether and how the terms of CEO compensation contracts at large commercial banks between 1994 and 2006 influenced, or were influenced by, the risky business policy decisions made by these firms. We find strong evidence that bank CEOs responded to contractual risk-taking incentives by taking more risk; bank boards altered CEO compensation to encourage executives to exploit new growth opportunities; and bank boards set CEO incentives in a manner designed to moderate excessive risk-taking. These relationships are strongest during the second half of our sample, after deregulation and technological change had expanded banks’ capacities for risk-taking.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherFederal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.frbkc.org/PUBLICAT/RESWKPAP/PDF/rwp10-02.pdf
dc.titleExecutive Compensation and Business Policy Choices at U.S. Commercial Banks
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorDeYoung, Robert
kusw.kudepartmentSchool of Business
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record