KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Development of an in situ Remediation Strategy for a Metals-Contaminated, Alkaline Groundwater

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    King_ku_0099M_12000_DATA_1.pdf (6.058Mb)
    Issue Date
    2012-5-31
    Author
    King, Aaron Scott
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    113 pages
    Type
    Thesis
    Degree Level
    M.S.
    Discipline
    Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Groundwater beneath a former industrial site in Tukwila, WA contains dissolved metals and organic material at high levels, as well as elevated pH (10-12). Contaminated groundwater discharge to site-adjacent waterways must be controlled to minimize impact to potential receptors. In a preliminary study, the efficacy of five amendments (chitosan, apatite, granular activated carbon (GAC), Thiol-SAMMS®, and limestone) was examined for the removal of copper, lead, vanadium, and arsenic for both unaltered and pH-adjusted (pH = 8) site groundwater in laboratory batch studies. Dissolved metals and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in site groundwater were measured both before and after pH adjustment, and after application of amendments. pH adjustment generally improved amendment performance. The greatest reductions in dissolved copper (70%), lead (62%), and vanadium (62%) concentrations were observed under pH-adjusted conditions in the presence of apatite. Thiol-SAMMS® also performed well under pH-adjusted conditions (Cu: 69% reduction; Pb: 46% reduction; V: 24% reduction), and also removed both copper (55% reduction) and lead (31% reduction) at the original pH. GAC was somewhat effective at removing lead under all conditions (15-30% reduction) and copper (31% reduction) when the pH was adjusted, and also reduced DOC concentrations under all conditions (24-27% reduction). These results suggest that a strategy using pH adjustment and some combination of apatite, Thiol-SAMMS®, and/or GAC may be best suited for remediation at this site. Further studies testing combinations of bone char (in place of apatite), GAC, and Thiol-SAMMS® were performed. In addition, the impacts of air sparging and pH adjustment through addition of hydrochloric acid or ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4:7H2O), a coagulant commonly used in conventional water treatment, were evaluated. The introduction of FeSO4:7H2O resulted in the formation of coagulation solids, further decreases in pH after the coagulation solids were removed, and the largest significant reductions of dissolved copper (at most 81%), arsenic (72%), vanadium (80%), and DOC (88%) of any treatment evaluated. Sparging with air increased reductions of lead concentrations for all pH adjustment strategies and slightly increased reduction of vanadium concentrations only when the pH was adjusted with FeSO4:7H2O. Combinations of bone char, GAC, and Thiol-SAMMS® generally did not confer a substantial advantage over single amendment treatments. Bone char, though, acted as a buffer to curb further decreases in pH after coagulation solids were removed. The drops in pH after the coagulation solids were removed, either with or without air sparging may be related to the oxidation of residual ferrous iron, but it is unclear if this single mechanism can explain the magnitude of the observed pH declines. Using the ferrous sulfate treatment strategy potentially combined with passive barrier or cap of bone char, flow-through column experiments will be designed to show how implementation of the strategy would impact the subsurface hydrology and to determine whether this strategy can achieve applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/9830
    Collections
    • Engineering Dissertations and Theses [1055]
    • Theses [3772]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps