Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeert, J. G.
dc.contributor.authorLieberman, Bruce S.
dc.date.accessioned2004-11-03T19:10:13Z
dc.date.available2004-11-03T19:10:13Z
dc.date.issued2004-05
dc.identifier.citationMeert, JG; Lieberman, BS. A palaeomagnetic and palaeobiogeographical perspective on latest Neoproterozoic and early Cambrian tectonic events. JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 2004 MAY; 161: 477 - 487.en
dc.identifier.otherISI:000221267900014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/93
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2000 The Geological Society of Londonen
dc.description.abstractDuring the latest Neoproterozoic to Mid-Cambrian time (580-505 Ma ago), the Earth underwent significant changes in palaeogeography that included rifting of a possible supercontinent and the near simultaneous formation of a second, slightly smaller supercontinent. It is against this tectonic backdrop that the Cambrian radiation occurred. Although the general tectonic setting during this interval is fairly well constrained, models of the exact palaeogeography are controversial because of the lack of reliable palaeomagnetic data from some of the continental blocks. Palaeogeographical models based on palaeomagnetic data range from a high-latitude configuration for most continents, to a low-latitude configuration for most continents, or to rapid oscillations in continental configurations triggered by inertial changes within the planet. Palaeobiogeographical data can also be used to help constrain palaeogeographical models. To this end we use vicariance patterns in olenellid trilobites to determine their compatibility with three end-member palaeogeographical models derived from palaeomagnetic data for the Neoproterozoic and early Cambrian. The most congruent palaeogeographical model with respect to the palaeobiogeographical data described herein is the high-latitude configuration for most continents. Those palaeomagnetic models that predict inertial interchange true polar wander or multiple episodes of true polar wander differ significantly from the results from palaeobiogeography. The low-latitude palaeogeographical models also differ from the results from palaeobiogeography, but this may partly arise because of a lack of palaeomagnetic and palaeobiogeographical data from many parts of present-day South America and Africa.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJournal of the Geological Society http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/geol/jgs;jsessionid=1tcapo57fbrqv.victoria?
dc.format.extent564180 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherGEOLOGICAL SOC PUBL HOUSEen
dc.subjectCambrian
dc.subjectNeoproterozoic
dc.subjectPolar wandering
dc.subjectBiogeography
dc.subjectTrilobites
dc.subjectTrue polar wander
dc.subjectIapetus ocean
dc.subjectPaleotectonic reconstructions
dc.subjectContinental reconstruction
dc.subjectMorphological disparity
dc.subjectTrilobite biogeography
dc.subjectEvolutionary explosion
dc.subjectPhylogenetic analysis
dc.subjectShackleton limestone
dc.subjectGlacial deposits
dc.titleA palaeomagnetic and palaeobiogeographical perspective on latest Neoproterozoic and early Cambrian tectonic eventsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.urihttp://id.worldcat.org/fast/1352218
dc.subject.urihttp://id.worldcat.org/fast/1068271
dc.subject.urihttp://id.worldcat.org/fast/832095
dc.subject.urihttp://id.worldcat.org/fast/1156738
dc.subject.fastCambrian Geologic Period
dc.subject.fastPolar wandering
dc.subject.fastBiogeography
dc.subject.fastTrilobites
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record