ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Analysis of the Employee Performance Evaluation System
dc.contributor.author | Mercado, Albert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T17:25:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T17:25:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/901 | |
dc.description.abstract | The employee performance evaluation system was developed with the thought of assisting management to effectively motivate and manage the actions of their employees. The system is deeply integrated within most companies and embraced by corporate management; however, the actual effectiveness of the system must be evaluated. Factors which contribute to the ineffectiveness of current employee performance evaluation systems are: the absence of focus on people, the perceived lack of importance from the participants, the systems direct attachment to monetary compensation, and the overall misunderstanding and misapplication of the system and philosophy by management. However, alternative approaches to the application of the traditional system exist such as: better hiring practices, open communication and candor between employees and management, a quality management approach to employee evaluations, and team based evaluations. | |
dc.format.extent | 1297142 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 961480 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1888575 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.title | Analysis of the Employee Performance Evaluation System | |
dc.type | Project | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |