Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSchrock, Steven
dc.contributor.authorJasrotia, Romika
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-02T19:13:48Z
dc.date.available2011-08-02T19:13:48Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-02
dc.date.submitted2011
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:11296
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7875
dc.description.abstractAccurate traffic data are essential for supporting a multitude of transportation related decisions which affect transportation system operations, management, and planning. Advanced technology offers us various alternatives for accurately collecting traffic data. But accuracy of data is not just about the mechanical accuracy of the device, but it also about how people react when they see these devices installed either on roads or off roads. It is very important that the drivers should not get affected by the presence of these devices as these devices are not always to control the speeds but they are also installed to measure the true speed of the drivers. Such studies are the basis for important decisions, such as setting speed limits, timing traffic signals, placing traffic signs, and determining the effectiveness of the countermeasures. To evaluate the effectiveness on speed distribution due to the presence of various intrusive and non-intrusive portable speed measurement devices, automated traffic counters with pneumatic tubes, Smartsensor, Autoscope with camera trailer and Lidar gun were compared. Results showed that drivers did not react to pneumatic tubes and continued driving at the same speed; there was no significant difference in speeds at different locations while pneumatic tubes were installed. Drivers tend to react most by reducing their speeds when a Lidar gun was used, the Autoscope with camera trailer also effected driver behavior to a considerable amount. There was slight increase in speeds when the Smartsensor was installed. Similar driver behavior was observed when effect on the speeds of faster drivers was evaluated. For this analysis drivers driving above 85th percentile speeds were picked and tracked throughout the test site. Drivers reacted most to Lidar guns and then to the Autoscope with camera trailer. There was no significant difference in speeds when pneumatic tubes were installed.
dc.format.extent71 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectCivil engineering
dc.subjectTransportation
dc.subject85th percentile speed
dc.subjectDriver behavior
dc.subjectPortable speed measurement devices
dc.subjectSpeed distribution
dc.subjectTraffic
dc.subjectVehicle speed
dc.titleEffect on Speed Distribution due to Intrusive and Non-Intrusive Portable Speed Measurement Devices
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberMulinazzi, Thomas E.
dc.contributor.cmtememberBai, Yong
dc.contributor.cmtememberHe, Jianghua (Wendy)
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineCivil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.S.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid7642791
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record