Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBanwart, Mary C.
dc.contributor.authorWarner, Benjamin R.
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-04T20:26:00Z
dc.date.available2011-07-04T20:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-27
dc.date.submitted2011
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:11539
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7757
dc.description.abstractIn spite of growing concerns about political extremism, no adequate measure exists to empirically test the character of political attitudes. The purpose of this study was to develop a measurement of political attitude extremism and, using this measure, assess the communication phenomena that contribute to political extremism. To this end, two surveys were distributed to a total of 504 participants (316 for Study 1 and 188 for Study 2). Study 1 assessed the properties of political attitude extremism. The second study used the measure developed in Study 1 to determine the extent to which media habits, homogeneity of social networks, partisan polarization, political information efficacy, political talk, and moral certainty contribute to political attitude extremism. Study 1 found that liberal attitude extremism and conservative attitude extremism are not opposite ends of the same spectrum but rather are distinct variables with unique measurement properties. Furthermore, conservative attitude extremism must be subdivided into fiscal conservative extremism and social conservative extremism, while liberalism did not require such a division. Study 2 found that these three extremism variables (liberal attitude extremism, social conservative attitude extremism, fiscal conservative attitude extremism) behave differently relative to the communication phenomenon examined. Specifically, ideological media use and political talk significantly predicted liberal attitude extremism, homogeneity of social network and partisan polarization significantly predicted social conservative attitude extremism, and partisan polarization and political information efficacy significantly predicted fiscal conservative attitude extremism. These findings demonstrate that scholarship must consider attitude extremism as multifaceted and must adjust theory accordingly. The new measurement tools provided by this study represent a significant advancement in the empirical study of political extremism.
dc.format.extent145 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectFragmentation
dc.subjectPolarization
dc.subjectPolitical communication
dc.subjectPolitical extremism
dc.titleFragmentation and Social Polarization: The Character of Political Attitude Extremism in America.
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberBanwart, Mary C.
dc.contributor.cmtememberParson, Donn W.
dc.contributor.cmtememberCarlin, Diana
dc.contributor.cmtememberHarris, Scott
dc.contributor.cmtememberChilders, Jay
dc.contributor.cmtememberLittle, Todd
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineCommunication Studies
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.oastatusna
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4842
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid7642945
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record