KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Experimental Study on Geocell-Reinforced Bases under Static and Dynamic Loading

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Pokharel_ku_0099D_11271_DATA_1.pdf (4.884Mb)
    Issue Date
    2010-10-20
    Author
    Pokharel, Sanat Kumar
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    349 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Geocells are a three-dimensional honeycomb type of geosynthetics used to reinforce weak soils and base courses of roads since the 1970s. However, this technology has been hindered by the lack of a reliable design method. The development of a reliable design method requires in-depth understanding of the geocell reinforcement mechanisms. In this study, laboratory model and full-scale moving wheel tests were conducted on geocell-reinforced granular bases over weak subgrade. Plate loading tests were conducted in the medium-scale and large-scale geotechnical boxes at the University of Kansas and full-scale moving wheel tests were conducted in the accelerated pavement testing facility at Kansas State University. Four types of geocells including one high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and three novel polymeric alloy (NPA) geocells were tested in the medium-scale plate loading tests. The effects of geocell confinement and other influence factors on the behavior of granular bases were studied. One selected type of NPA geocell was used in the large-scale cyclic plate loading tests and the moving wheel tests. The subgrade used in the large-scale plate loading tests was an artificial mix of Kansas River sand and kaolin while A-7-6 clay was used in the moving wheel tests. Four types of infill materials including crushed limestone aggregate (AB-3), quarry waste (QW), Kansas River (KR) sand, and Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) were used as the base courses in this study. More than 50 medium-scale plate loading tests, 12 large-scale cyclic plate loading tests, and 4 moving wheel tests on unpaved road sections were conducted. The road sections were exhumed and examined after all the large-scale cyclic plate loading tests and the moving wheel tests. The benefits of NPA geocell reinforcement were evaluated in terms of the number of wheel passes at 75 mm of rut depth and the vertical stress distribution. The test results were analyzed separately in terms of different test methods. It is shown that geocells placed in a circular shape performed better than those in an elliptical shape. NPA geocells increased the stiffness and ultimate bearing capacity of granular bases by 1.5 to 2.0 times. NPA geocell-reinforced bases had higher stiffness and bearing capacity than HDPE geocell-reinforced bases. NPA geocells significantly reduced permanent deformations of granular bases with the number of cycles or wheel passes and increased stress distribution angles. The existence of geocells made compaction more difficult and it was found that the relative compaction of infill materials in geocells is important for the performance of geocell-reinforced bases. The established design method for the planar geosynthetic reinforcement was modified for the NPA geocell-reinforced bases over weak subgrade and calibrated based on the test results from the large-scale cyclic plate loading tests and the moving wheel tests. The California Bearing Ratios (CBR) of the subgrade and base course, the number loading cycles or wheel passes required for 50 to 75 mm rut, the height of geocell, and the thickness of the base course were the variables used to calibrate this design formula. The design method was used to verify the test results and yielded a good comparison.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7719
    Collections
    • Engineering Dissertations and Theses [1055]
    • Dissertations [4473]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps