Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBranscombe, Nyla R.
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Tracey Jean
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-04T17:07:31Z
dc.date.available2011-07-04T17:07:31Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-27
dc.date.submitted2010
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:11126
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7712
dc.description.abstractThree studies were conducted to test whether people, including singles themselves, experience personal angst or worry about their own future when the value of marriage is threatened and, as a result, they attempt to protect the institution of marriage by expressing prejudice against single people. Study 1 (a community sample) found that even when controlling for SES, age, and religious and political ideology, participants' expectations for a negative future mediated the positive relationship between angst concerning the state of marriage in the United States and expressed biases against single people. There was a positive relationship between angst and biases against single people, and expected negative future mediated this relationship. Study 2 is an experimental design (with an all single sample) that tested whether threatening or affirming the value of marriage would affect single people's feelings of angst and expressed biases against their own group. Participants expressed more biases against singles when the value of marriage was affirmed and angst mediated the effects of the experimental condition on biases against singles. The mediated effect was a suppressed effect such that when controlling for angst, the direct affirm condition effect on biases against singles became stronger. Participants in the threat condition, in contrast, reported increased angst, and angst positively predicted biases against single people. Study 3 replicates the findings of Study 2, but also provides support for a double mediation model in which angst mediates the relationship between the condition effect on expected negative future, as with Study 2. Further, expected negative future mediated the relationship between angst and biases against single people, as with Study 1. Together, these findings suggest that single people who are told that the institution of marriage is failing are more apprehensive about expressing prejudice toward their own potential future group membership. Further, these results support the suppression-justification model such that single people who are given justifications to express biases against their own group will do so if they do not experience angst in response to the threat. In contrast, when singles experience angst in response to threats to the institution of marriage, they respond by derogating their own group.
dc.format.extent67 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectSocial psychology
dc.subjectAngst
dc.subjectJustification
dc.subjectMarriage
dc.subjectPrejudice
dc.subjectSingles
dc.subjectThreat
dc.titleAngst and Expressed Biases Against Single People: Responses to Threats to the Institution of Marriage
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberCrandall, Christian S.
dc.contributor.cmtememberMolina, Ludwin
dc.contributor.cmtememberLandau, Mark
dc.contributor.cmtememberObadare, Ebenezer
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePsychology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid7642785
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record