Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAtchley, Paul
dc.contributor.authorChan, Mark Sai Leong
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-21T20:33:30Z
dc.date.available2011-02-21T20:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationAtchley, Paul & Chan, Mark. Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: A driving simulator investigation. Human Factors. Feb. 2011. 53(1):3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720810391215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7121
dc.descriptionPermissions were not obtained for sharing the full text of this article.
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was to investigate the nature of concurrent task interference during a vigilance task and to determine whether a concurrent task improves performance with decreased vigilance. Background: Research has repeatedly shown that engaging in a cell phone conversation while driving increases the risk of getting into crashes. At the same time, it has also been found that task monotony could lead to an increase in crash risk. There is evidence that suggests that engaging in a concurrent task reduces the effects of monotony, leading to an improvement in vigilance task performance. Method: A monotonous drive in a driving simulator was used to investigate the effects of a concurrent verbal task. Three task conditions were used: no verbal task, continuous verbal task, and late verbal task. Results: When engaged in a secondary verbal task, drivers showed improved lane-keeping performance and steering control when vigilance was lowest. Conclusion: A strategically placed concurrent task can improve performance when vigilance is at its lowest. Application: There is potential for the design of a countermeasure system that can be strategically activated by an automated system monitoring driver performance.
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.titlePotential Benefits and Costs of Concurrent Task Engagement to Maintain Vigilance: A Driving Simulator Investigation
dc.typeOther
kusw.kuauthorAtchley, Paul
kusw.kuauthorChan, Mark
kusw.kudepartmentPsychology
kusw.oastatuspublisherdenied
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0018720810391215
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. Publisher denied.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record