ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Early usage of DO in children with and without Specific Language Impairment
dc.contributor.advisor | Rice, Mabel L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Blossom, Megan Stratton | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-03T05:07:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-03T05:07:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-09-15 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10575 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7018 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study examined the early uses of DO in the spontaneous language samples of 89 children, 37 with Specific Language Impairment, age 5;0-5;6, 37 age-equivalent control children, and 15 language-equivalent control children, age 2;6-4;10. Auxiliary DO has been examined in some studies of language acquisition because of its status a carrier of finiteness in questions and negations. However, DO has multiple functions which have received little or no attention in previous work on the early language abilities of children with and without SLI. This study sought to begin to fill that gap by documenting the affirmative DO uses in yes/no questions, wh- questions, proform contexts, elliptical contexts, and emphatic contexts. All DO uses in each child's spontaneous language sample were counted and categorized. Findings indicate that children with SLI showed lower levels of accuracy on both yes/no and wh- questions compared to the age-equivalent control group. Compared to the language-equivalent group children with SLI showed particular difficulty only with DO in wh-questions. Children with SLI showed remarkably high levels of accuracy on forms of DO where the DO carries semantic as well as syntactic information: proform and elliptical DO. The findings presented here are consistent with the Extended Optional Infinitive Account of SLI (Rice, Wexler, & Cleave 1995), and indicate that finiteness in the CP projection may be a particular area of weakness for children with SLI, as evidenced by poor performance on DO in questions. | |
dc.format.extent | 81 pages | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas | |
dc.rights | This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author. | |
dc.subject | Language, linguistics | |
dc.subject | Health sciences | |
dc.subject | Speech pathology | |
dc.subject | Auxiliary | |
dc.subject | Child grammar | |
dc.subject | Do | |
dc.subject | Eoi | |
dc.subject | Finiteness | |
dc.subject | Specific language impairment | |
dc.title | Early usage of DO in children with and without Specific Language Impairment | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Rosen, Sara | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Storkel, Holly | |
dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Child Language | |
dc.thesis.degreeLevel | M.A. | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
kusw.bibid | 7079208 | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Linguistics Dissertations and Theses [95]
-
Theses [4088]