Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoodman, Neal
dc.contributor.authorTimm, Robert M.
dc.contributor.authorSlade, Norman A.
dc.contributor.authorDoonan, Terry J.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-27T02:09:19Z
dc.date.available2010-12-27T02:09:19Z
dc.date.issued1996-02
dc.identifier.citationWoodman, N., R. M. Timm, N. A. Slade, and T. J. Doonan. 1996. Comparison of traps and baits for censusing small mammals in Neotropical lowlands. Journal of Mammalogy 77(1):274–281.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/6927
dc.description.abstractSnap-traps, live-traps, and baits affect the ability to capture small mammals, but few previous studies have involved sampling communities of small mammals in tropical environments. We tested differences in captures of small marsupials and rodents by Victor snap-traps versus Sherman live-traps and by two types of bait in lowland rainforest at Reserva Cuzco Amazónico, southeastern Peru. Snap-traps took ca. 3.5 times as many individuals as live-traps. Snap-traps also captured more species (and more rare species), but we attribute this to more numerous captures overall because the relative proportions of species captured by the two traps generally were the same. Type of bait had little impact on our trapping results.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Mammalogy
dc.subjectBait choice
dc.subjectCommunity structure
dc.subjectMammals
dc.subjectNeotropics
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectSherman live traps|Small mammals
dc.subjectSnap-traps
dc.subjectSouth America
dc.titleComparison of traps and baits for censusing small mammals in Neotropical lowlands.
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorTimm, Robert M.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology & Evolutionary Biology
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record