ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAraujo, John
dc.contributor.authorBorn, David G.
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-30T20:33:58Z
dc.date.available2005-09-30T20:33:58Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.citationAraujo, John; Born, David G. Behavior-Analyst. Fall 1985. 8(2): 207-208.
dc.identifier.other1987-20818-001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/683
dc.descriptioncalculation vs knowledge of formula for percentage agreement, behavioral scientists
dc.description.abstractThe conclusion that many behavioral scientists can correctly calculate percentage agreement, but most cannot write the formula used to calculate percentage agreement, is substantiated; purported proof for the correct formula is described.
dc.format.extent388590 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAssn for Behavior Analysis
dc.subjectBehavioral Assessment
dc.subjectStatistical Analysis
dc.titleCalculating percentage agreement correctly but writing its formula incorrectly
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record