Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yan Bing
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-21T14:56:03Z
dc.date.available2010-10-21T14:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationZhang, Y. B. (2004). Initiating factors of Chinese intergenerational conflict: Young adults' written accounts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19, 299-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JCCG.0000044686.61485.94
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/6830
dc.descriptionAuthor final draft The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com doi:10.1023/B:JCCG.0000044686.61485.94
dc.description.abstractThis study examined young adults’ written accounts of intergenerational communication in conflict situations in the People's Republic of China. Using a content analysis approach, this study identified five major types of initiating factors that precipitated intergenerational conflict. Old-to-young criticism was most frequent, followed by illegitimate demand and rebuff. The least frequent initiating factors included young-to-old criticism and disagreement/generation gap. In addition, results indicated that more rebuffs were from nonfamily elders than from family elders, whereas disagreement with family elders was more frequent than with non-family elders. Proportionally speaking, no differences emerged between family and non-family elders for criticism (both old-to-young and young-to-old) and illegitimate demand. Results are discussed with respect to research in intergenerational communication, interpersonal conflict, and the Chinese socio-cultural norm of hierarchy and filial piety.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectChinese Intergenerational Conflict
dc.subjectInitiating Factors
dc.subjectFilial Piety
dc.subjectFamily And Nonfamily Elders
dc.titleInitiating factors of Chinese intergenerational conflict: Young adults' written accounts
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorZhang, Yan Bing
kusw.kudepartmentCommunication Studies
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/B:JCCG.0000044686.61485.94
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record