ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEbmeier, Howard
dc.contributor.authorKobler, Angelique L.
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-03T15:24:23Z
dc.date.available2010-10-03T15:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-15
dc.date.submitted2010
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/6785
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of the employment interview system for Principals (ICIS-Principal). This instrument attempts to predict the effectiveness of principal applicants as building leaders, determined through a set of employment interview questions aligned with the primary themes found within the current literature on principal effectiveness. In particular, this study asks whether a set of effective questions can be created and, when administered by a skilled interviewer; accurately predict whether a candidate will be a successful building principal as defined by ratings from the central office. Study participants were obtained from a public school district, Guilford County Schools, North Carolina. The basis for the ICIS-Principal interview system is founded on the 2008 Educational Leadership Policy Standards, the updating of the 1996 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC). Reliability was established through the use of Cronbach's Alpha to determine how well the interview questions correlated with the constructs. Pearson correlations were utilized to determine how well the total interview instrument was able to predict the rating of job performance provided by the central office. The relationship between scores on the instrument was not positively correlated with supervisor ratings. These results did not produce the findings sought by the study. Thus, this particular structured interview instrument, which was based upon best practices for principals, did not prove to be a good indicator of principal performance considered exemplary by central office personnel.
dc.format.extent48 pages
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectEducational leadership
dc.subjectEmployment
dc.subjectInterviews
dc.subjectLeadership
dc.subjectPrincipal
dc.subjectStandards
dc.subjectSuccessful
dc.titleThe Development and Field Test of an Employment Interview System to Identify Successful School Principals
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberMahlios, Marc
dc.contributor.cmtememberCrawford, George
dc.contributor.cmtememberPerkins, Perry
dc.contributor.cmtememberMcEwen, Terry
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineEducational Leadership and Policy Studies
dc.thesis.degreeLevelEd.D.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid7078737
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record