| dc.contributor.author | Innocenti, Beth | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-30T17:27:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-30T17:27:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Innocenti Manolescu, Beth. "Norms of Presentational Force." Argumentation and Advocacy 41 (2005): 139-51. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/6596 | |
| dc.description | This is the author's accepted manuscript, made available with permission of the American Forensic Association. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Can style or presentational devices reasonably compel us to believe, agree, act? I submit that they can, and that the normative pragmatic project explains how. After describing a normative pragmatic approach to presentational force, I analyze and evaluate presentational force in Susan B. Anthony's "Is it a Crime for a U. S. Citizen to Vote" as it apparently proceeds from logic, emotion, and style. I conclude with reflections on the compatibility of the normative pragmatic approach with the recently-developed pragma-dialectical treatment of presentational devices. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | American Forensics Association | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | http://www.americanforensics.org/uploaded-files/tc_41_3_w05.pdf | |
| dc.subject | Force | |
| dc.subject | Normative Pragmatics | |
| dc.subject | Style | |
| dc.subject | Strategic Maneuvering | |
| dc.subject | Anthony, Susan B. | |
| dc.title | Norms of Presentational Force | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| kusw.kuauthor | Innocenti, Beth | |
| kusw.kudepartment | Communication Studies | |
| kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
| kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
| kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
