KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Percentage of Highly Qualified Math/Science Teachers and Variables that Affect the Likelihood of Being Highly Qualified, by State, Before and After NCLB

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Kolarik_ku_0099D_10864_DATA_1.pdf (682.7Kb)
    Issue Date
    2010-06-29
    Author
    Kolarik, Anne Catherine
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    167 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ed.D.
    Discipline
    Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A major concern of educators today is to ensure that our nation's elementary and secondary schools are staffed with qualified teachers. The quality of teachers and teaching undoubtedly becomes one of the most important factors in shaping the learning and growth of students. The assignment of teachers to teach out-of-field is believed by some to be a contributor to low quality teaching. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 established a nationwide goal of reducing and eliminating gaps between groups of students, and recognized the key to improving student learning and closing achievement gaps depends upon access to highly qualified teachers for all students. The purpose of this study was to see how state teacher certification requirements changed after No Child Left Behind Act and whether NCLB affected the percentage of highly qualified teachers in each state. The practical purpose of this study was to ascertain whether NCLB and middle school licensure requirement reform have had an effect on the number of highly qualified and non-highly qualified middle-school teachers in hard to staff areas like math and science. Using Schools and Staffing Survey data from school years 1999-2000 and 2003-2004, this study found that on the average there was a slight increase in percent middle-school science teachers with science majors from 1999-2000 to 2003-2004 but a decrease in percent of fully certified math and science teachers and a decrease in middle-school math teachers with math majors. Certain states, Nebraska, Alabama, District of Columbia, New York and New Jersey were consistently high in percent majors while certain other states, Kentucky, Georgia, Tennessee, Arizona and North Carolina were consistently low with Kentucky low in both categories (percent fully certified middle-school math teachers with math majors, percent fully certified middle-school science teachers with science majors) during both school years. Some states increased in both percent fully certified and majors in both math and science: Minnesota, North Dakota, and New Hampshire. Vermont, DC, Michigan and Ohio decreased in both of these categories. To show statistical significance, a logistic regression and odds ratio was done to compare states' likelihood of having matched teachers (which means fully certified with a major in the field taught) to Kansas's teachers' likelihood of being matched. This revealed that teachers who taught in DC were 615% more likely to be matched than those who taught in Kansas during 1999-2000. Only teachers who taught in Minnesota have greater odds of being matched than Kansas teachers during both 1999-2000 and 2003-2004. A regression analysis showed that certain teacher factors affected the likelihood of a teacher being matched. These variables were middle-school teacher who teaches in high school vs. middle-school teacher who teaches in middle school or elementary school, fully certified vs. not fully certified, and, male vs. female. The individual state certification requirements were compiled from before and after NCLB and compared to see if licensure changes affected how states fared in percent majors and fully certified. After NCLB, several states added middle level endorsements in math and science that increased teachers' opportunities to become highly qualified. Some states increased the stringency to become highly qualified by adding content preparation requirements and/or "specific subjects required." These changes were considered positive changes in certification requirements after NCLB. A negative change after NCLB was the decrease in content preparation requirements, or changing from requiring specific subjects to not requiring these subjects. The results of this study did not show any particular trend in terms of which states tended to increase or decrease in the percent of full certification and major of middle-school math and science teachers from both years of SASS data. It showed that there were particular states that had increased or decreased in their percent of full certification and major but no correlation emerged.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/6478
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4474]
    • Education Dissertations and Theses [1065]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps