ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSin, Ray
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-13T16:17:24Z
dc.date.available2010-01-13T16:17:24Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifier.citationSocial Thought and Research, Volume 30 (2009), pp. 87-116 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5701
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/5701
dc.description.abstractAfter decades of seeing emotions as irrational and unimportant, scholars in social movements are beginning to value the role of emotions in social movements. This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on emotions and contentious politics by proposing a synthesized tri-variate framework called the “emotional tripod.” The emotional tripod consists of three mutually constitutive “legs” that explain the origins of emotions (emotional habitus), the process of intensifying and transforming emotions (emotional effervescence) and the quality of the emotions generated (affective/reactive emotions). This paper empiricizes the framework by looking at the visual materials produced by PETA. Lastly, this paper briefly critiques the efficacy of emotions in generating collective action.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.titleEmotionally Contentious Social Movements: A Tri-Variate Framework
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.5701
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record