Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHill, Shirley
dc.contributor.authorLeyser, Ophra
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-30T04:10:38Z
dc.date.available2009-07-30T04:10:38Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-31
dc.date.submitted2009
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10225
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/5319
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is a qualitative study based on 28 interviews with both women and men who have used, or are currently in the process of using, any type of fertility treatment. My major research question is what is the social process of fertility treatments? In pursuing that question, I also ask why do people want their own biological children? How do people understand genetics? What is the diagnostic process of fertility treatments and what are the gendered implications? What is the treatment process? How do people view the treatment they received and what amount of agency did they take in their care? My first analytical chapter finds that majority of the men in the study felt strongly about having a genetic connection to their own child, and both men and women wanted a biological child in order to fit into a "normal" family model. Even if using donor genetic material to accomplish that goal, having a biological connection made them feel like they had some control over their child's physical, health, and personality traits. I also find that both men and women have an simplistic view of genetics. The second analytical chapter finds that women initiated contact with the medical community and their bodies were the focus of fertility testing and treatment. Receiving an infertility diagnosis mostly had negative effects on women, such as anger, guilt, and blame. Further, I posit that the specific diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome is a new case of the medicalization of women's bodies. The third analytical chapter explicitly outlines the numerous physical and emotional difficulties of going through the treatment process. Finally, chapter seven explores the relationships between physicians and their patients. In it, I outline some questionable physician behaviors and attitudes and find that patients responded in various ways, from deference to physician authority, to taking agency in self-help, to switching physicians, and exploring alternative treatments.
dc.format.extent267 pages
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectGender studies
dc.subjectIndividual and family studies
dc.subjectFamily
dc.subjectFertility treatments
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectMedical sociology
dc.title"Choosing" Parenthood through Fertility Treatments: The Importance of Biological Children and the Difficult Roads in their Pursuit
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberZimmerman, Mary K.
dc.contributor.cmtememberEkerdt, David
dc.contributor.cmtememberAlbrecht, Sandra L.
dc.contributor.cmtememberBreedlove, Ginger
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineSociology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid6857447
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record