Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkard, Patrick J.
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:46:26Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:46:26Z
dc.date.issued2002-04-01
dc.identifier.citationSocial Thought and Research, Volume 25, Number 1&2 (2002), pp. 175-189 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5193
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/5193
dc.description.abstractThis essay examines three competing interpretations of the Founding Fathers that were made in the contested political climate of the 1980s. The first is Marc Plattner s neoclassical economic interpretation that stresses Madisonian principles of law, property rights, and the danger of majoritarian rule to justify a minimal rule-based government and free market capitalism. The second is Robert Bellah s communitariandemocratic interpretation, which appeals to the Founders and our republican traditions to critique excessive individualism and advance a more democratic politics governed by the norms of civic virtue. The third approach considered is the anti-Federalist critique of the Founders by Sheldon Wolin, who sees in the Constitution the beginnings of a system of national capitalism and state power that undermined localized and democratic political culture. Each approach will be assessed for its contribution toward a more participatory notion of public life.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titleIn Search of Civic Virtue : On the Use of the Founders in Political Discourse
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.5193
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record