Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHickey, Ann Marie
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:45:54Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:45:54Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationSocial Thought and Research, Volume 24, Number 1&2 (2001), pp. 33-35 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5187
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/5187
dc.description.abstractAs a doctoral student in the Sociology progranl at the University of Kansas, I have been privy to several lectures and panel discussions by leading scholars in my field. The 2001 Clark Lecture (Social Thought &Research, 2002, Vol. 24, 1& 2)was no exception to this trend. For the first time in my life, I was able to listen to a presentation given by one of my scholarly heroes, Robert Connell. Based on this lecture given by such a prominent scholar in the field of gender, I now have the distinct privilege-or harrowing curse, depending on how you look at it-ofcomposing a reaction piece based on Connell's lecture, Understanding Men: Gender Sociology and the New Intemational Research on Masculinities.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titleReaction to R.W.Connell's Understanding Men: Gender Sociology and the New International Research on Mascudinities
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.5187
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record