Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHennen, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:45:47Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:45:47Z
dc.date.issued2001-04-01
dc.identifier.citationSocial Thought and Research, Volume 24, Number 1&2 (2001), pp. 121-144 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5177
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/5177
dc.description.abstractAn analysis of some of the varying historical and cross-cultural meanings of effeminancy and their relationship to hegemonic masculinity provides a unique perspective on the social construction of the sex/gender system currently operating in most industrialized societies of the West. In this paper I present a brief review of the historical uses of effeminancy in Europe and the US and develop a five point typology. My survey reveals a plethora of meanings, linking effeminacy alternaely with deficient citizenship, a general lack of sexual restraint, excessive heterosexual behavior, exclusive connection with passive homosexual activity, and finally as an incorrigible proposition that utilizes a naturalistic narrative to link it with homosexual orientation regardless of sexual role. I then employ the typology introduced here to expand and augment an argument advanced by Randolph Trumbach to explain the emergence of the strong cultural link between effeminacy and homosexuality during the 18th century.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titlePowder, Pomp, Power: Toward a Typology and Genealogy of Effeminacies
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.5177
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record