Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCooke, Marvin L.
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:39:56Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:39:56Z
dc.date.issued1994-04-01
dc.identifier.citationMid-American Review of Sociology, Volume 18, Number 1&2 (WINTER, SPRING, 1994), pp. 47-65 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5106
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/5106
dc.description.abstractA ruse is a gimmick or device used as a strategy or instrument. For Foucault, method can best be understood as a ruse rather than as a method which promises truth. Methods regulate what can be discovered and the discourse about what can be discovered In this essay. the realist and idealist models of method are criticized from Foucault's perspective. Both models rely on some transcendental reality which -- from Foucault's perspective -- are constructed by the practices of research itself. Even though Foucault rejects foundational assumptions, he does have a method which has its homogeneity, its systematicity, and its generality. Foucault's method is outlined, discussed, and related to similar methods. Finally, Foucault's critics are noted and answered.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titleMethod as Ruse: Foucault and Research Method
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.5106
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record