| dc.contributor.author | Margolis, Diane Rothbard | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-05-19T18:37:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-05-19T18:37:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992-04-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mid-American Review of Sociology, Volume 16, Number 1 (SPRING, 1992), pp. 29-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5080 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/5080 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper analyzes differences between social welfare emanating from a reciprocity orientation that had its roots in charity and the church and social welfare emanating from a pooling orientation that had its roots in work relegated to women in the family, It suggests that pooling welfare is more appropriate to the state, but that the more successful a program is the more likely it is to blunt the public support it requires. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Department of Sociology, University of Kansas | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045. | |
| dc.title | Women's Work, Care-GivingandTwo Traditions in SocialWelfare | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.17161/STR.1808.5080 | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
