Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCrane, Jeffrey L.
dc.contributor.authorDasilva, Fabio
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:25:30Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:25:30Z
dc.date.issued1982-01-01
dc.identifier.citationMid-American Review of Sociology, Volume 7, Number 2 (WINTER, 1982), pp. 105-127 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4927
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/4927
dc.description.abstractThis essay represents an attempt to critically assess the intellectual orientation often termed 'structuralism.' In particular, the essay is concerned with European, and even.more specifically French, structuralism as displayed in the writings of Louis Althusser, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, and C. LeviStrauss. The analysis indicates that despite a novel language, an often rigorous character, and some interesting, indeed exciting, intellectual constructions, structuralism is very much a child of positivism. The positivism [structuralism relationship is most clearly revealed when structuralism is contrasted with Marxian social inquiry. For comparative and illustrative purposes, then, the essay contrasts structuralism and Marxism.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titleDE/STRUCTURING THE STRUCTURALIST ACTIVITY A CRITIQUE OF SELECTED FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURALIST PROBLEMATIC
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.4927
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record