Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBradfield, Cecil D.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, R. Ann
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:25:03Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:25:03Z
dc.date.issued1982-04-01
dc.identifier.citationMid-American Review of Sociology, Volume 7, Number 1 (SPRING, 1982), pp. 125-138 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4911
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/4911
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the role relationship of olergy and funeral directors from the perspective of the funeral director. Much of the conflict can be explained from a socio-historical perspective as the status of the funeral director has been enhanced and that of the clergy has become more tenuous. Funeral directors are moving boldly into the area of itgrief counseling" which previously was the almost exclusive domain of the clergy. For their part, funeral directors see clergy involvement in funeral purchases as a particularly irritating role infringement. In a more positive vein, many funeral directors and clergy are engaging in open communication in a way that promotes "good grief" for the bereaved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titleAN UNEASY ALLIANCE: DOCTORS OF GRIEF AND DOCTORS OF DIVINITY
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.4911
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record