KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Benefit Finding and Perceived Obligations of Victims

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    umi-ku-2262_1.pdf (517.1Kb)
    Issue Date
    2007-12-11
    Author
    Warner, Ruth
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    76 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    PH.D.
    Discipline
    Psychology
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In three studies, I examine the concept of benefit finding in victimization from the perspective of nonvictims, and consider what consequences benefit finding might have for evaluation of victims. In Experiment 1, participants read about a victim of abuse and thought about the lesson of victimization for the perpetrator or the victim. Participants perceived the victim as more obligated to help and to not do harm when focused on the victim as compared to the perpetrator, to the extent that they believed victims should find benefits. In Experiment 2, I examined what happens when a victim does not live up to this expectation of improvement following trauma. Participants read about a victim of abuse and thought about the lessons of the abuse for the victim or perpetrator. As in Experiment 1, when focused on the victim, participants believed more strongly that the victim should find benefits and that they have future obligations. Participants then read that the victim either subsequently had no criminal record or that he sexually abused someone himself. When focused on the lessons of victimization for the victim, participants desired more social distance from the victim who did harm than when focused on the lessons for the perpetrator. The extent that participants believed the victim should have found benefits mediated the condition effect on these responses. In Experiment 3, I compared victims who do harm versus nonvictims who do harm. Participants read about a target with either a victimization history or no victimization history who abused a child as an adult or did not abuse a child as an adult. Participants rated the victim with a criminal record more negatively than the nonvictim with a criminal record, but did not rate a victim differently from a nonvictim if they had no criminal record. These studies show that victims incur obligations due to the idea that they should find benefits. When victims do not fulfill their obligations towards others, they face negative evaluation. The research shows that the way nonvictims make meaning of victimization has implications for the victim.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/4258
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4475]
    • Psychology Dissertations and Theses [459]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps