KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Crash Analysis of Work Zone Lane Closures with Left-Hand Merge and Downstream Lane Shift

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    umi-ku-2645_1.pdf (4.771Mb)
    Issue Date
    2008-07-17
    Author
    See, Chen Fei
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    127 pages
    Type
    Thesis
    Degree Level
    M.E.
    Discipline
    Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) began the Interstate Rehabilitation Program (IRP) in the spring of 2000 that ultimately rebuilt approximately 380 miles, or 60% of Arkansas' 655-mile Interstate system. While these projects were underway, a new lane closure method, the "Iowa weave," or lane closure with a left-hand merge and lane shift, was introduced to AHTD to effectively save time ensuring that these IRP projects were completed on schedule. Contractors on the projects used the Iowa weave at least 50% of the time for each of the projects. The settings between the Iowa weave and the conventional right-lane closure were rotated on a periodic basis depending on the work to be completed on each side of the lane. Construction officials in AHTD agreed that the use of the Iowa weave helped them to complete the rehabilitation program on time and improved traffic safety, as no major concerns were noted due to this new technique. However, the crash analysis of this weaving pattern as opposed to the conventional right-lane closure has not been assessed to determine which lane closure strategy has an advantage on the basis of actual crash experience. This research examined the work zone crashes in both of the lane closure settings by assessing them with a set of independent variables that have been known to be the factors that influence work zone crashes. In order to properly assess the comparison between the two lane closure strategies, the following primary research objectives were pursued: Examination of crash experience results from the two traffic control methods, and Reexamination of the advantages and disadvantages of the Iowa weave method as compared to the conventional right-lane closure. This study analyzed the crash data between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2005 on the characteristics of lane closure strategies in Arkansas. The findings of the analyses were organized by: 1) Raw number of crashes (Pearson chi-square and One-Way ANOVA tests); 2) Crash rates (paired t-test); and Crash severity (binary logistic regression modeling). The analysis results of this study may be used for DOTs to reference the impressive rehabilitation work that the AHTD has completed by incorporating the use of the Iowa weave. The results of the statistical analyses showed that there was approximately a 30 percent reduction in crash rate when the Iowa weave configuration was used. Nonetheless, the final results of the logistic regression model found that the safety advantages between the Iowa weave and conventional right-lane closure in changing crash severity were not statistically significant. Traffic volume was found to be the parameter that most significantly affected crash severity in the logistic regression model. Also, the effects of lighting conditions and intersecting streets on the severity of crashes were found to be insignificant.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/4162
    Collections
    • Engineering Dissertations and Theses [705]
    • Theses [3228]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps