dc.contributor.advisor | Manolescu, Beth I | |
dc.contributor.author | Samuels, Phillip Dewayne | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-08-05T12:59:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-05T12:59:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-04-25 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:2387 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/4070 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis does a rhetorical analysis of Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 to understand its failure to achieve its goal of a George W. Bush defeat in the 2004 election. To do this I outline a theory of counternarrative which relies on argument theory to understand the resolution of competing narratives. I begin by creating a nuanced theory of counternarrative which relies on informal logic and Ralph Johnson's dialectical tier. Then I look at the construction of Bush's official narrative from his public speeches beginning on September 20, 2001 through the invasion of Iraq. After detailing Bush's narrative I analyze the moments of argumentative clash between it and Fahrenheit 9/11. I conclude that the failure of Moore's counternarrative was inevitable due to its poor argument construction and omission of the dialectical tier. | |
dc.format.extent | 125 pages | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas | |
dc.rights | This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author. | |
dc.subject | Language | |
dc.subject | Rhetoric and composition | |
dc.subject | Rhetoric | |
dc.subject | Communication studies | |
dc.title | Fahrenheit 9/11: A Case Study in Counternarrative | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Harris, Scott | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Pennington, Dorthy | |
dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Communication Studies | |
dc.thesis.degreeLevel | M.A. | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |