Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCorbeill, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorFranks, MaryLee
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-21T23:15:43Z
dc.date.available2008-07-21T23:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2008-05-27
dc.date.submitted2008
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:2467
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/3980
dc.description.abstractThe extent of Etruscan influence on early Rome is nearly impossible to determine because ancient authors have masked Rome's Etruscan heritage. The primary written sources preserve a complex and often disguised account of Rome's debt to Etruria but Etruscan origins are obscured to such a degree that the arguments over the magnitude of Etruscan influence range from claims that the influence is minor to advocacies for a wholesale Roman import of Etruscan ideas and technology. Modern scholars have attempted to add to the list present in the primary sources by using archaeological and linguistic evidence but there is no consensus for an accepted set of Etruscan borrowings. By investigating the primary sources, I argue that the seemingly disordered Roman treatment of Etruscan influences is not accidental and that the complexity of the tradition illustrates the willingness of ancient authors to remove all traces of Etruscan recognition from Roman rituals.
dc.format.extent55 pages
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectAncient languages
dc.subjectAncient history
dc.titleA Brief History by the Victor
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberWelch, Tara
dc.contributor.cmtememberYounger, John
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineClassics
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.A.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record