ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNeidert, Pamela L
dc.contributor.authorGorycki, Kathryn Ann
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-06T15:06:50Z
dc.date.available2024-07-06T15:06:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-31
dc.date.submitted2022
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18366
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/35373
dc.description.abstractReinforcers are critical for skill acquisition and behavior reduction for children with intellectual and developmental disorders (IDD). Identifying reinforcers is often a routine part of the assessment and treatment development process (Hagopian et al., 2004). To date, no studies have examined the efficacy of using pictures of edibles in an electronic format (e.g., pictures of food on a tablet) to identify preferred edibles. Thus, the purpose of this study is to extend the literature on preference assessment modalities using technology by examining the extent to which results of multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) preference assessments using electronic pictures as selection stimuli (and without contingent access to edibles for selection) correspond to standard MSWO assessments using edibles as selection stimuli (with contingent access for selection). Additionally, reinforcer assessments were conducted to assess validity of the results for both stimulus preference assessment (SPA) modalities. A secondary purpose was to assess prerequisite skills that may be necessary to perform accurately in an electronic-picture preference assessment. Overall, results suggest that the electronic-picture modality was effective for four of the five participants; however, two of the four participants required modifications to the reinforcer assessment procedure to reveal efficacy. Future research with more participants (including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is warranted.
dc.format.extent122 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectBehavioral sciences
dc.subjectMSWO
dc.subjectpreference assessment
dc.subjectReinforcer assessment
dc.subjectreinforcer identification
dc.subjectSPA
dc.titleAn Evaluation of an Electronic Picture-Based Multiple-Stimulus-Without-Replacement Preference Assessment
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberDozier, Claudia L
dc.contributor.cmtememberHarrison, Kelley L
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineApplied Behavioral Science
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.A.
dc.identifier.orcid


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record