ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBucini, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorClark, Eric M.
dc.contributor.authorMerrill, Scott C.
dc.contributor.authorLangle-Chimal, Ollin
dc.contributor.authorZia, Asim
dc.contributor.authorKoliba, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorCheney, Nick
dc.contributor.authorWiltshire, Serge
dc.contributor.authorTrinity, Luke
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Julia M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T17:32:18Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T17:32:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-19
dc.identifier.citationBucini G, Clark EM, Merrill SC, Langle-Chimal O, Zia A, Koliba C, Cheney N, Wiltshire S, Trinity L and Smith JM (2023) Connecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisions. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:1067364. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1067364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/35204
dc.description.abstractThe acceleration of animal disease spread worldwide due to increased animal, feed, and human movement has driven a growing body of epidemiological research as well as a deeper interest in human behavioral studies aimed at understanding their interconnectedness. Biosecurity measures can reduce the risk of infection, but human risk tolerance can hinder biosecurity investments and compliance. Humans may learn from hardship and become more risk averse, but sometimes they instead become more risk tolerant because they forget negative experiences happened in the past or because they come to believe they are immune. We represent the complexity of the hog production system with disease threats, human decision making, and human risk attitude using an agent-based model. Our objective is to explore the role of risk tolerant behaviors and the consequences of delayed biosecurity investments. We set up experiment with Monte Carlo simulations of scenarios designed with different risk tolerance amongst the swine producers and we derive distributions and trends of biosecurity and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv) incidence emerging in the system. The output data allowed us to examine interactions between modes of risk tolerance and timings of biosecurity response discussing consequences for disease protection in the production system. The results show that hasty and delayed biosecurity responses or slow shifts toward a biosecure culture do not guarantee control of contamination when the disease has already spread in the system. In an effort to support effective disease prevention, our model results can inform policy making to move toward more resilient and healthy production systems. The modeled dynamics of risk attitude have also the potential to improve communication strategies for nudging and establishing risk averse behaviors thereby equipping the production system in case of foreign disease incursions.en_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rights© 2023 Bucini, Clark, Merrill, Langle-Chimal, Zia, Koliba, Cheney, Wiltshire, Trinity and Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleConnecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorKoliba, Christopher
kusw.kudepartmentPublic Affairs and Administrationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1067364en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Bucini, Clark, Merrill, Langle-Chimal, Zia, Koliba, Cheney, Wiltshire, Trinity and Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2023 Bucini, Clark, Merrill, Langle-Chimal, Zia, Koliba, Cheney, Wiltshire, Trinity and Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.