ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRomero-Alvarez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cevallos, Daniel F
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Irene
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T17:02:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-03T17:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-03
dc.identifier.citationRomero-Alvarez D, López-Cevallos DF, Torres I. Doctors for the people? The problematic distribution of rural service doctors in Ecuador. Health Policy Plan. 2023 Aug 2;38(7):851-861. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad040. PMID: 37402618; PMCID: PMC10394494en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/35087
dc.description.abstractPrimary health care is at the core of health systems that aim to ensure equitable health outcomes. With an estimated 36% of rural population, Ecuador has a service year programme (created in 1970) for recently graduated doctors to provide primary care services in rural and remote communities. However, little has been done to monitor or evaluate the programme since its inception. The aim of this study was to assess Ecuador’s rural medical service implementation with a focus on equitable distribution of doctors across the country. For this purpose, we analysed the distribution of all doctors, including rural service doctors, in health-care facilities across rural and remote areas of Ecuador in the public sector at the canton level for 2015 and 2019, by level of care (primary, secondary and tertiary). We used publicly available data from the Ministry of Public Health, the Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security and the Peasant Social Security. Our analyses show that two of every three rural service doctors are concentrated at the secondary level, while almost one in five rural service doctors, at the tertiary level. Moreover, cantons concentrating most rural service doctors were in the country’s major urban centres (Quito, Guayaquil, Cuenca). To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative assessment of the mandatory rural service year in Ecuador in its five-decade existence. We provide evidence of gaps and inequities impacting rural communities and present decision makers with a methodology for placement, monitoring and support of the rural service doctors programme, provided that legal and programmatic reforms come into place. Changing the programme’s approach would be more likely to fulfill the intended goals of rural service and contribute to strengthening primary health care.en_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.comen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectPrimary health careen_US
dc.subjectRural healthen_US
dc.subjectNeedsen_US
dc.subjectInequalityen_US
dc.subjectHealth facilitiesen_US
dc.subjectPhysiciansen_US
dc.subjectHealth servicesen_US
dc.subjectPersonnelen_US
dc.titleDoctors for the people? The problematic distribution of rural service doctors in Ecuadoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorRomero-Alvarez, Daniel
kusw.kudepartmentBiodiversity Instituteen_US
kusw.kudepartmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czad040en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-6046en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2788-9749en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-3090en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC10394494en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com