ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrick, Samuel E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T20:56:34Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T20:56:34Z
dc.date.issued1952-05-31
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/34879
dc.description.abstractThe expression "general education" has come into use during the last score of years and largely supersedes the expression "liberal education." The latter, meaning literally an education to "set one free," can be interpreted in a broad sense as an education which is directed toward preparing individuals to have knowledge, understanding, and competence to deal independently and cooperatively with important social, political, and personal problems. However, there is some feeling that the educational program of many liberal education institutions has become so specialized and narrow in scope that the term "liberal" should no longer be used, for fear that it will be construed to refer to the educational programs of these schools, rather than to the original purpose of the expression.

The McGrath Report states: The original purposes of liberal education in preparing men and women for a free life which they would share with all their countrymen in a free society has been overshadowed by specialized vocational training. Liberal arts colleges have been so preoccupied with the training of psychologists, chemists, and musicians, that they have neglected the education of the free man.

It is for the foregoing reason that "general" often is substituted for "liberal," although the choice may not be a happy one, since "general" may be interpreted in different ways; in addition, some authors do not use these two words synonymously. Webster offers the following among his definitions of the word "general": "Of or pertaining to the whole of a body, society, organization or the like"; "Not restrained or limited to a precise import or application; not specific; not entering into details or minutiae"; "Concerned or dealing with universal rather than particular aspects"; "Pertaining to, affecting, or applicable to, many, or the greatest number of, persons, cases, or occasions"; "Not precise or definite; approximate."

The point must be mentioned that in the present study the expression "general education" is used only in connection with higher education unless otherwise indicated. Primary and secondary education are, of course, general, and the expressions "life adjustment" and "common learnings" have been popular in describing general education at these levels.
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansasen_US
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.en_US
dc.subjectMusic educationen_US
dc.titleThe Development of Criteria for Music in General Education At the University Levelen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineMusic Education
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.kudepartmentMusic Educationen_US
dcterms.descriptionPh.D. University of Kansas, Music Education 1952
kusw.bibid3428184
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record