Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhittemore, Donald O.
dc.contributor.authorButler, James J., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorBohling, Geoffrey C.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Blake B.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-10T14:29:01Z
dc.date.available2023-08-10T14:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01
dc.identifier.citationWhittemore, D.O., Butler, J.J. Jr., Bohling, G.C., Wilson, B.B., (2023), Are we saving water? Simple methods for assessing the effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures, Agricultural Water Management, vol. 287, 108408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108408.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/34708
dc.description.abstractSubstantial storage reductions by irrigation pumping in many of the world’s major aquifers jeopardize future food production. As a result, new conservation measures are being utilized to reduce pumping and extend aquifer lifespans. The key question is how effective are these practices in attaining true water conservation (i.e., water use reduction) for a given area? Relationships between pumping and precipitation help provide an answer, as precipitation explains most of the variation in annual irrigation water use for aquifers in semi-arid to sub-humid climates when surface water supplies are limited. Our objective is to utilize correlations between radar precipitation and irrigation groundwater use at a range of spatial scales to assess the effectiveness of conservation approaches in the High Plains aquifer in the central USA. Linear regressions between pumping and precipitation for a conservation area established in 2013 in northwest Kansas indicate that water use and water use per irrigated area were over 27 % less and 25 % less, respectively, during 2013–2021 compared to the same climatic conditions during 2005–2012. Similar regressions found over a 38 % reduction and 23 % reduction in irrigation water use and use per irrigated area, respectively, during 2018–2021 compared to the same conditions during 2005–2017 in a west-central Kansas county with conservation areas. A decrease in irrigated area accounted for most of the difference between these reductions. Higher R2 values after conservation area establishment imply that irrigation tracks precipitation better due to use of soil moisture sensors and other measures as part of increased irrigation efficiency and enhanced water management. The precipitation and water use relationships, which are statistically significant for a wide range of spatial scales, have great potential for assessing the effectiveness of conservation practices in areas with high-quality water use and precipitation data.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectWater conservationen_US
dc.subjectRadar precipitationen_US
dc.subjectIrrigationen_US
dc.subjectHigh Plains aquiferen_US
dc.titleAre we saving water? Simple methods for assessing the effectiveness of groundwater conservation measuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorWhittemore, Donald O.
kusw.kuauthorButler, James J., Jr.
kusw.kuauthorBohling, Geoffrey C.
kusw.kuauthorWilson, Blake B.
kusw.kudepartmentKansas Geological Surveyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108408en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.