Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDusin, Jarrod
dc.contributor.authorMelanson, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMische-Lawson, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T20:27:55Z
dc.date.available2023-06-27T20:27:55Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-22
dc.identifier.citationDusin J, Melanson A, Mische-Lawson LEvidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping reviewBMJ Open 2023;13:e071188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071188en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/34454
dc.descriptionA grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this scoping review was to identify and review current evidence-based practice (EBP) models and frameworks. Specifically, how EBP models and frameworks used in healthcare settings align with the original model of (1) asking the question, (2) acquiring the best evidence, (3) appraising the evidence, (4) applying the findings to clinical practice and (5) evaluating the outcomes of change, along with patient values and preferences and clinical skills.

Design A Scoping review.

Included sources and articles Published articles were identified through searches within electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) from January 1990 to April 2022. The English language EBP models and frameworks included in the review all included the five main steps of EBP. Excluded were models and frameworks focused on one domain or strategy (eg, frameworks focused on applying findings).

Results Of the 20 097 articles found by our search, 19 models and frameworks met our inclusion criteria. The results showed a diverse collection of models and frameworks. Many models and frameworks were well developed and widely used, with supporting validation and updates. Some models and frameworks provided many tools and contextual instruction, while others provided only general process instruction. The models and frameworks reviewed demonstrated that the user must possess EBP expertise and knowledge for the step of assessing evidence. The models and frameworks varied greatly in the level of instruction to assess the evidence. Only seven models and frameworks integrated patient values and preferences into their processes.

Conclusion Many EBP models and frameworks currently exist that provide diverse instructions on the best way to use EBP. However, the inclusion of patient values and preferences needs to be better integrated into EBP models and frameworks. Also, the issues of EBP expertise and knowledge to assess evidence must be considered when choosing a model or framework.
en_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.titleEvidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorDusin, Jarrod
kusw.kuauthorMische-Lawson, Lisa
kusw.kudepartmentTherapeutic Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071188en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-9235en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1601-9465en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.